The United Arab Emirates has introduced sweeping new regulations for Emiratis pursuing higher education overseas. Under the new mandate, only students enrolling in universities recognised by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research will be eligible, and those universities must meet strict global ranking requirements. While the government sees this as a way to improve educational quality, align talent with national priorities, and ensure job readiness, critics warn the policy may unintentionally limit opportunities for Emirati students. The changes also raise broader questions about the role of global university rankings in shaping international student mobility.
Read More: Hospitality College Expands International Programs This Summer
The New Criteria Explained
According to the Education, Human Development, and Community Development Council, Emiratis must now choose universities that meet one of the following conditions:
- Top 50 worldwide in the chosen field of study, regardless of overall ranking or location.
- Top 100 overall and in field rankings for institutions in the United States and Australia.
- Top 200 overall and subject-specific in other English-speaking countries.
- Top 300 overall and subject-specific in non-English-speaking countries.
By aligning scholarships and approvals with these benchmarks, the UAE hopes to raise the global competitiveness of its students and ensure they return with degrees from institutions recognised worldwide.
A Push for Quality and Job Readiness
For policymakers, the rationale is clear: top-ranked universities are assumed to offer stronger academic quality, better research exposure, and higher employability outcomes. The government believes restricting scholarships to elite institutions will help Emiratis thrive in a competitive global job market.
However, this focus on rankings has drawn criticism from education specialists who argue that academic excellence cannot be reduced to a single number on a league table. Moreover, several structural barriers stand in the way for Emirati students.
Challenges Facing Emirati Students
Stephen Hanchey, a monitoring and evaluation specialist, points out that while some private schools in the UAE follow international curricula, many Emiratis struggle with admissions to top-ranked institutions.
Standardised entry tests such as the SAT, ACT, TOEFL, and IELTS often disadvantage students from non-Western systems. Limited access to high-quality test preparation, uneven exposure to academic English, and unfamiliarity with holistic admission processes all present hurdles.
Even when Emirati students perform well compared to peers in the region, studies show weaknesses in reading comprehension, analytical writing, and interactive classroom participation. Hanchey suggests the UAE could support students by funding foundation year or pre-academic programs, similar to initiatives in Singapore and Saudi Arabia, to bridge these gaps before enrollment abroad.
Impact on Universities Abroad
The rules also reshape how foreign universities view the UAE. For example, institutions like California State University, Fresno, ranked among the top 200 in the United States, fall short of the UAE’s new eligibility criteria.
Eddie West, assistant vice-president for international affairs at Fresno, expressed concern:
“I understand the Ministry’s rationale, but I can’t help but question the restriction of opportunities for students.”
He added that Middle Eastern students, once a significant part of Fresno’s international community, are now fewer, partly due to stricter scholarship requirements across the region. The UAE’s new rules may further limit the flow of Emirati students to universities outside the global top 100.
The Controversy Around Rankings
The UAE’s reliance on rankings also revives long-standing debates. While widely recognised systems such as QS, Times Higher Education (THE), Academic Ranking of World Universities (Shanghai Rankings), and US News shape global perceptions, many academics argue they lack transparency.
Ranking organisations often rely on self-reported data, charge universities for advertising or consultancy, and assign weight to criteria that may not reflect student outcomes. The Conversation, in a widely read analysis, highlighted that rankings are “not completely transparent about what they measure and how much each component counts.”
Critics stress that universities known for social mobility, community impact, and affordability often fail to score highly in rankings, despite delivering strong real-world outcomes. West notes that Fresno State, for example, consistently ranks in the top 10 US universities for social mobility—a factor absent from most global ranking metrics.
Global Policy Trends
The UAE is not alone in linking scholarships to rankings. Countries such as India, China, and Japan also prioritise outbound students attending top 100–200 global universities. Dan Smith, founder of RESI Consultancy, observes that student mobility is becoming increasingly influenced by state policy rather than personal choice alone.
This trend could harm “tier-two” universities outside the elite group. Institutions in secondary cities, as well as purpose-built student accommodation providers, may face falling demand from students in markets like the UAE, China, and India if eligibility rules elsewhere follow suit.
Ripple Effects on Housing and Partnerships
Smith warns that if demand for lower-ranked institutions declines, it could affect tuition income, academic programs, and international partnerships. Housing operators catering to international students could also face fluctuating occupancy rates.
“We could see swings in occupancy across certain locations, reduced demand in secondary cities, and greater competition for tenants in top-tier academic hubs,” he said.
In cities like Preston, home to the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan), which hosts many Emirati students, the policy could affect both the university and the local housing market. Operators, Smith advises, should diversify their student base and move beyond offering accommodation to becoming strategic partners in student recruitment and support.
Why the UAE is Taking This Step Now
The timing of the policy aligns with the UAE’s broader national strategies. Universities within the country, particularly in Dubai and Abu Dhabi, have improved their standing in global rankings. By raising the bar for studying abroad, the government may also encourage more students to choose domestic institutions.
Additionally, the government has expressed growing concern about the UAE’s long-term demographic balance. With declining fertility rates—from 6.7 children per woman in 1970 to 3.7 in 2017—policymakers are increasingly focused on strengthening Emirati identity, supporting larger families, and ensuring that education abroad serves national priorities rather than individual preferences alone.
Frequently Asked Questions:
What are the UAE’s new study abroad rules?
The UAE now requires Emirati students to enrol only in foreign universities recognised by the Ministry of Higher Education and ranked within strict global thresholds.
Why did the UAE introduce these ranking-based requirements?
The government aims to boost graduate employability, align education with national priorities, and ensure Emiratis study at globally competitive institutions.
How will these rules affect Emirati students?
Students may face tougher admission challenges due to high entry standards, limited test preparation resources, and stricter eligibility for scholarships.
What concerns do experts have about the new criteria?
Critics argue rankings are not always transparent, often ignore measures like social mobility, and could restrict opportunities for capable students.
Which universities might lose Emirati students under the new policy?
Mid-tier universities outside the top 100–300, such as California State University Fresno or the University of Central Lancashire, may see reduced Emirati enrolment.
How could global higher education markets be impacted?
Countries and universities outside elite rankings may face declining applications, affecting tuition revenue, international partnerships, and student housing demand.
Does this policy benefit UAE universities?
Yes. By limiting overseas options, the UAE strengthens its domestic universities, many of which have recently risen in global rankings.
Conclusion
The UAE’s ranking-based study abroad policy reflects the country’s ambition to prepare its students for a highly competitive global workforce while safeguarding national priorities. By directing scholarships and approvals toward top-ranked institutions, the government hopes to ensure Emiratis graduate with world-class skills. Yet, the reliance on global rankings introduces challenges—limiting opportunities, overlooking universities with strong but unranked outcomes, and placing added pressure on students navigating competitive admissions processes.
